Monday, August 31, 2009

Right Laura...!
Suzanne was on air. Jessica had a lovely black dress. That is a pretty good conclusion altogether, "I should advocate greater despatch in the business of amendments, if I were not convinced of the absolute necessity there is of pursuing the organization of the Government; because I think we should obtain the confidence of our fellow- citizens, in proportion as we fortify the rights of the people against the encroachments of the Government" (James Madison). Amasing... as he was talking about his own government.... how would you explain he thought it was the right thing to do when today it's much easier to find "powers" working to fortify government's rights through regulation and intervention? According to you, how do you explain the today's lack of interest for the people's rights against the encroachments of the government worlwide? How do you explain that even when the people in various part of the world made some significant victory other some oppressive regime, they were never close to be able to protect themselves from the next government's encroachments, why their new leader were never wise enough (despite the American example) to offer that protection to the people from the most obvious, their coming own oppression? How would you explain, describe and rate the illusion that a Bill of Rights against any government can be judged unnecessary?
Let's find out what Wolf has.
James Madison about the Bill of Rights....It has been said, that in the Federal Government they are unnecessary, because the powers are enumerated, and it follows, that all that are not granted by the constitution are retained; that the constitution is a call of powers, the great residuum being the rights of the people; and, therefore, a bill of rights cannot be so necessary as if the residuum was thrown into the hands of the Government. I admit that these arguments are not entirely without foundation; but they are not conclusive to the extent which has been supposed. It is true, the powers of the General Government are circumscribed, they are directed to particular objects; but even if Government keeps within those limits, it has certain discretionary powers with respect to the means, which may admit of abuse to a certain extent, in the same manner as the powers of the State Governments under their constitutions may to an indefinite extent; because in the constitution of the United States, there is a clause granting to Congress the power to make all laws which shall be necessary and proper for carrying into execution all the powers vested in the Government of the United States, or in any department or officer thereof; this enables them to fulfil every purpose for which the Government was established. Now, may not laws be considered necessary and proper by Congress, for it is for them to judge of the necessity and propriety to accomplish those special purposes which they may have in contemplation, which laws in themselves are neither necessary nor proper; as well as improper laws could be enacted by the State Legislatures, for fulfilling the more extended objects of those Governments. I will state an instance, which I think in point, and proves that this might be the case. The General Government has a right to pass all laws which shall be necessary to collect its revenue; the means for enforcing the collection are within the direction of the Legislature: may not general warrants be considered necessary for this purpose, as well as for some purposes which it was supposed at the framing of their constitutions the State Governments had in view? If there was reason for restraining the State Governments from exercising this power, there is like reason for restraining the Federal Government."
Did James to a certain extent admitted that the Gov and the People can have conflicts whatever the theory says of a Republican Government (about the Bill of Rights)" that they are unnecessary articles of a Republican Government, upon the presumption that the people have those rights in their own hands, and that is the proper place for them to rest."?
Yes he did...! This is why the Bill of Rights was adopted not just for the rights it contains but as a reminder by its presence that for every citizen of a free country there is a daily duty, check there is no reason to restrain the Government.
Is Mark Loyd a Republican? He isn't I guess and that's no news but that's his right specially now that he is a part of the Government and you can feel right away how right were the Founding Fathers when debating the Bill of Rights. Thomas never excluded from "A bill of rights is what the people are entitled to against every government on earth, general or particular; and what no just government should refuse, or rest on inferences." --Thomas Jefferson to James Madison, "The declaration of rights is, like all other human blessings, alloyed with some inconveniences and not accomplishing fully its object. But the good in this instance vastly outweighs the evil." --Thomas Jefferson to James Madison, his own Government, did he?
That's what so far has always opposed Republicans and others.... most others have decided that the Gov can represent the People by being elected and therefore can declare that whatever they do, think is the People's will and desire .... Republicans have repeatdly opposed that, knowing that the power always lead to the desire for oppression regardless of how you obtained it....
Glen...Be good! What did you mean by nobody can remember GW the second first term?

Wednesday, August 26, 2009

Look, .... don't say anything, I already know.... It's shameful.... it's terrible.... I'm a terrible person.... a disaster for progress.... BUT..... this is just my darkside you know, I'm a good guy. If given the choice, a barbecue at the beach (let's say Daytona or Melbourne Beach) or a terrorist interogation session even enhanced, I choose without any hesitation the beach with friends. To tell you the truth I don't understand why some work so hard to have the worse of myself exposed.... Really, explain me why it seems that some people (tv networks) are paid to excite my worse instincts when you have been able to witness it, I, most of the time manage to police my ideas and expose the distinctive side of my undoubtedly admirably urbanised side?

Tuesday, August 25, 2009

To start with I was a bit surprised the CIA had hired some ACLU very active members for their new tv campaign. I'd never heard of anything like that in the passed but well these days, you know... trillions deficits, bailout by the hundreds of billions, I thought well, that's modern times I guess. Waited for the first spots, and , altogether I'm quite satisfied, the idea was good, to be honest, didn't think it would to start with, but been convinced.
Kill Americans by the thousands or less, you may be threatened!
Destroy American lives you could end up being scared for your life and for your loved ones!
Plan attacks on American soil and suffer from insomnia!
Attack America and deal with the drill! (love that one!)
(free food and drinks for an unlimited period of time and free healthcare, CIA courtesy)
All ads are ACLU approved warning message.
Legal disclaimer :
If you may suffer from any of the above, give up any killings, murders, attacks on US soil or targeting US interests abroad you may have in mind.
Suzanne, love you new hair cut, look great, makes you look younger!

Thursday, August 20, 2009

The interesting thing though is, the compassionate gesture by the Scottish Authorities is answered with a hero welcome home which indicates very clearly the kind of compassion you can expect from the other side for the 270 victims....always good to know.
Here are what the two had to say in today's Guardian in case you look for it.

Robert Brown, a Scottish Liberal Democrat justice spokesman, said the decision was "wrong in principle, wrong in practice and sets the wrong precedent".

John Lamont, a Scottish Conservative justice spokesman, warned that if Megrahi was released "without compelling medical evidence that he is gravely ill", it would prove to be "a catastrophic decision".
With a very different seat in the Scottish political spectrum, Robert Brown look very interesting too. If possible. Be great to hear.
If the story goes on as it should, I would love to hear what John Lamont has to say about the decision. Now that we heard what the Secretary had to say, it would be fair for a complete view of the various opinions in Scotland to have John Lamont interviewed tomorrow night...
Disturbing? Is there a deal?

Wednesday, August 19, 2009

Diana, do not touch your nose with your fingers when takink to me, please.
Love that blue top..!
It's a disaster...!
Shameful... look at what crosses my mind and makes me laugh... I mean, what am I gonna do??
Look at what's left of it,....!
Think of how much the paris regime has spent in state's propaganda for the past 27 years to "urbanised me ".... make me look acceptable, sayin things you normally expect from a regular person fed for so long with the regime's ideology....
I'm ashamed of myself.....!
GO GREEN : Hang high'n'short!

Tuesday, August 18, 2009

It's a shame that death penalty was carried out like that. It should be done the green way, a good old re-usable rope, it's green and quick.